I do not keep in mind a time when choosing the most effective graphics card was such a troublesome resolution. In earlier years we have possibly made it simpler on ourselves by occurring primarily a sliding efficiency scale, with a nod to cost banding, however this yr I need to be a bit extra definitive concerning the precise GPUs we advocate somewhat than simply providing you with a giant ol’ record of graphics playing cards to choose from.
However I’ve examined and gamed on just about each new graphics card that is been launched on this era, from the Intel Battlemage playing cards that launched late final yr, by means of the preliminary Nvidia RTX Blackwell launch, and on to AMD’s RDNA 4 playing cards. I consider that makes me nicely positioned to speak you thru what the greatest graphics card is of this era, and it is the AMD Radeon RX 9070.
For many PC avid gamers that is the graphics card which gives essentially the most efficiency for the cash, delivering first rate 1440p efficiency, and far improved ray tracing over earlier AMD generations of GPU. It is also rocking 16 GB of VRAM to have the ability to ship on excessive graphics settings at that decision now and into the longer term, too. It was priced appallingly at launch, however now it is settling down and delivering efficiency near the RX 9070 XT and subsequently the RTX 5070 Ti.
Absolutely the high, from a pure efficiency standpoint, nevertheless, is the Nvidia RTX 5090. That is the greatest high-end graphics card with no different contenders getting close to its combine of favor, options, and uncooked computational grunt. It is also a card the place no-one will get shut when it comes to worth, both, particularly with costs the best way they’re proper now.
Excessive. That is what costs are proper now, with quoted MSRPs being pure fiction whereas provide and demand appear so erratically balanced, after which there’s the appreciable flux of tariff associated worth hikes, too. Primarily it is powerful to be after a brand new graphics card in 2025.
Fast record

One of the best total graphics card
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is our present choose for the most effective graphics card for many PC avid gamers. Its worth/efficiency combo, coupled with the enhancements that AMD has made to each its ray tracing and upscaling tech, makes it a winner for me.

One of the best worth graphics card
With a one-two proper on the high of this information, it reveals simply how nicely AMD’s new RDNA 4 playing cards have accomplished. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT reveals each the purple staff’s dedication to good worth, and delivering a bunch of VRAM by means of the stack.

One of the best price range graphics card
It was something however a shoo-in for Intel’s low-cost Arc B570 to get a choose in our greatest GPU information, but it surely’s obtained a whole lot of VRAM for the cash, and when it is round its MSRP there’s nothing that may contact it. Till the RTX 5050 comes again into inventory, possibly.

4. Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
One of the best mid-range graphics card
It is a bit of a combat between the RTX 5070 Ti and RX 9070 XT for this spot, however the Nvidia simply wins as globally the worth delta between them is not so nice. And costs being related, the GeForce card has a greater function set, higher overclocking, and better total fps.

5. Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090
One of the best high-end graphics card
Whereas it might solely be some 30% sooner than the RTX 4090, there isn’t a different client GPU on the planet that comes near its energy or potential. And it additionally has the Multi Body Gen magic trick at its disposal to ship ludicrous body charges in suitable video games.

Dave James
Dave first began as a PC {hardware} journalist, after years of freelance video games journalism, means again in 2005 when he began with PC Format journal. In that function, and plenty of others since, he is examined just about each single graphics card era and structure launched within the intervening years. He is the particular person greatest positioned round PC Gamer to let you know which graphics card is the most effective proper now, as a result of he is used all of them.
July 5, 2025: I’ve added in a full rundown of precisely how we check every graphics card that crosses our desks. And there is a whole lot of work that goes into benchmarking and reviewing a brand new GPU, and we’re now presenting all the information we acquire right here, in addition to in all of the opinions that we do.
July 4, 2025: Full rewrite of the most effective graphics card, with a wholly new record and categorisation. I’ve additionally included the specs of all the newest generations of AMD and Nvidia graphics playing cards, in addition to a GPU heirarchy itemizing for the newest graphics playing cards, too.
January 30, 2025: Added within the new RTX Blackwell playing cards now that they’ve been launched… and instantly disappeared from inventory. Although certainly restocks shall be coming alongside quickly for the RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 GPUs.
1. Greatest total graphics card: AMD Radeon RX 9070
Purchase if…
✅ You need a good 1440p GPU, and an awesome 1080p one: With the ray tracing updates baked into RDNA 4, the RX 9070 is now a incredible all-round graphics card. It will possibly nail 1440p and 1080p resolutions at high settings, and may name on FSR and AMD’s body era function to offer you a lift in case you want it.
✅ You are completely happy to undervolt/overclock: With some straightforward tweaks within the AMD drivers you possibly can enhance the efficiency of the GPU to inside a few proportion factors of the RX 9070 and RTX 5070 Ti. And the most effective half is that it does not demand a ton extra energy or cooling to get there, so should not stress you or your fancy new card.
Do not buy if…
❌ Yow will discover an RX 9070 XT for something near the identical worth: When you can overclock the non-XT card to get inside 2% of the efficiency, costs being equal the XT card is a no brainer.
The underside line
🪛 The Radeon RX 9070 is a wonderful graphics card in case you’re on the lookout for excessive 1440p efficiency with out the virtually $1,000 worth factors of the competing Nvidia playing cards. With the market as it’s, the AMD card is the most effective GPU for many PC avid gamers.
The RX 9070 is a somewhat agonising choose as the most effective graphics card round proper now. There are inevitable caveats round my resolution, as a result of fairly clearly this second-tier RDNA 4 GPU is not essentially the most {powerful} GPU you should buy. The AMD Radeon RX 9070, nevertheless, is the graphics card I believe makes essentially the most sense to essentially the most PC avid gamers.
And, realistically, it is going to be the one which I’d counsel to my PC gaming associates if they arrive on the lookout for a advice. Fortunately, I do not even have associates.
The RX 9070 gives near the efficiency of AMD’s strongest RDNA 4 GPU, nonetheless packs in 16 GB of GDDR6 video reminiscence, will be simply overclocked with out demanding far more cooling or energy, and handily outperforms Nvidia’s equally priced, lower-spec RTX 5070.
I used to be comparatively cool on the cardboard in my preliminary evaluate of the GPU, primarily as a result of our first style of it was a card that XFX hiked the worth of out the gate, which made it greater than a reference RX 9070 XT. As issues have evened out, there are reliably cheaper RX 9070 playing cards round and while you take a look at the graphics card market as an entire, the Radeon stands out as an awesome choose.
But I nonetheless have not come to that conclusion evenly. My first thought was going to be recommending the $370 RX 9060 XT, as a result of it’s nice worth, performs nicely, and just about gives efficiency parity with the dearer Nvidia choice. Nevertheless it does not really feel like an awesome advice for the greatest graphics card, provided that it’s a third-tier Radeon that is not notably thrilling.
The Radeon RX 9070 XT, although, is a incredible card and have been it not for the ludicrous over-pricing of AMD’s most interesting it will completely be my high choose. With an MSRP of $599 it will be a simple selection for its spectacular efficiency out of the field, beautiful under-volting body price bumps, and the wonderful filip of the brand new FSR4 upscaler. However the most cost-effective you will get it for today continues to be close to $750, with the RX 9070 typically round $100 cheaper with very related gaming efficiency.
Although the RX 9070 continues to be $100 greater than AMD’s MSRP for the GPU, which does completely sting. These are the graphics card hell instances, nevertheless, so that’s virtually to be anticipated. Within the UK it’s extra cheap, with a £540 price ticket trending down in direction of its MSRP, and that’s welcome information for PC avid gamers and hopefully provides a glimpse as to what worth normalisation would possibly begin to appear to be for folks within the US down the road.
Although it’s completely value noting that Nvidia’s competing, and competent, RTX 5070 is usually cheaper and nearer to its personal MSRP.
That card is usually behind the curve on the subject of gaming efficiency; we have discovered it on common round 7% slower in straight raster body charges. It too is a superb overclocking card, however when each the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 are pushed to their limits, the AMD card truly stretches its result in round 10% sooner than the GeForce GPU.
In pure efficiency phrases, then, it is the AMD RX 9070 all the best way. However there may be one trick the Radeon can’t match, and that is the RTX 5070’s Multi Body Era (MFG) function. Having the ability to drop in as much as three additional AI generated frames in between every truly rendered one can provide the Nvidia card much more spectacular efficiency in supported video games, although it may possibly additionally introduce graphical artifacts the place the preliminary gaming efficiency is simply too low.
Principally, the decrease you go down the GPU stack, the much less efficient MFG is. Although, I’ll say that with AMD’s new machine learning-based FSR 4 upscaler being in so few of the video games that you’ll be enjoying, Nvidia’s DLSS 4 and Body Gen function bundle stays a really compelling one.
Ultimately although, the additional raster efficiency of the Radeon RX 9070—and the way shut it may possibly get to the dearer RTX 5070 Ti and RX 9070 XT GPUs—makes it the most effective graphics card to purchase proper now for many PC avid gamers.
Learn our full AMD Radeon RX 9070 evaluate.
⬇️ Click on to load the benchmark information⬇️

2. Greatest worth graphics card: AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
Purchase if…
✅ You need a whole lot of VRAM with out spending a ton of money: The 16 GB model of the RX 9060 XT has an MSRP of $349, and even in these price-inflated instances it is commonly out there proper now for nicely below $400.
✅ You need an reasonably priced improve for contemporary 1080p or 1440p gaming: Clean 4K gaming is past even the quickest price range playing cards, however at decrease resolutions the RX 9060 XT delivers nice efficiency for the money, notably in comparison with earlier generations.
✅ You need bang in your buck: The RX 9060 XT may not be the quickest card available on the market, however nothing touches it at this worth.
Do not buy if…
❌ You’ll be able to actually stretch that price range: For below $400 there may be nothing that touches the RX 9060 XT, however in case you can push on to ~$450 that brings you into RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB territory. That’s an total sooner GPU with extra overclocking potential.
❌ You need productiveness efficiency: It is a gaming card, by means of and thru, so in case you’re on the lookout for productiveness chops then Nvidia is the best way to go.
The underside line
🪛 The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT isn’t a horny graphics card, it is not the quickest graphics card, but it surely’s an trustworthy GPU that may ship good gaming efficiency at the preferred resolutions with high settings. And all for below $400.
To have the ability to choose up a real 16 GB graphics card, with a significantly performant GPU core at its coronary heart, for below $400 is fairly nice. It could be even higher if the cardboard in query was truly retailing for its unique MSRP, however even on the present barely over MSRP pricing, the Radeon RX 9060 XT continues to be our choose for the most effective worth graphics card immediately.
Okay, the newest AMD RDNA 4 GPU isn’t fairly residing as much as its launch claims of beating the RTX 5060 Ti, definitely not throughout our benchmarking suite, however at 1080p the Nvidia card is lower than a proportion level forward on common, and it is by solely 3% at 1440p. Successfully, I believe we are able to kinda name that parity.
The GeForce card is extra constantly forward at 4K—despite the fact that they each carry 16 GB on the highest variations of the cardboard—however neither are able to truly playable body charges at that decision. And even the boon of Multi Body Era cannot assist in actuality.
However the parity at 1440p and 1080p itself is spectacular for the AMD card, particularly while you bear in mind that we’re testing video games which have fairly hefty ray tracing workloads in them as a part of our benchmarking gauntlet. Traditionally that is the place AMD playing cards have fallen down in opposition to Nvidia, however the brand new RDNA 4 structure has modified round how the Radeon playing cards cope with ray tracing, giving them extra devoted silicon to do the work, and that has made all of the distinction.
One other space the place there was historic Nvidia dominance is within the function set, and truthfully, the inexperienced staff nonetheless has the sting on that depend. The dual pillars of DLSS 4 upscaling and the Multi Body Era (MFG) function do give the GeForce card some actual advantage. However the high quality expertise of MFG could be very depending on there being a comparatively excessive, constant body price earlier than the interpolation of as much as three additional frames kicks in. Meaning its effectiveness does diminish decrease down the GPU stack.
AMD has launched its personal new upscaler on this era, nevertheless, with FSR 4. That is a brand new tackle the GPU function, extra carefully resembling Nvidia’s DLSS because it now makes use of machine studying to enhance the visible constancy of the upscaled picture. It is solely in just a few of the video games we’re enjoying in the intervening time, however hopefully it would begin to turn out to be as ubiquitous as normal FSR and DLSS going ahead. It is definitely a powerful piece of tech, and when mixed with AMD’s personal body gen tech it does give the RDNA 4 structure some efficient weapons in its arsenal, closing that hole with Nvidia an entire bunch on this era.
However do not anticipate a lot in the best way of overclocking with this card. A stunning function of all the newest GPUs from Nvidia and AMD has been their proclivity for overclocking or undervolting. Not so right here. Our testing has proven that AMD’s engineers have clearly pushed the Navi 44 silicon as arduous as it may possibly to ensure that it to get as near the RTX 5060 Ti as doable. Meaning there isn’t any actual headroom there for the tip consumer to play with.
The RTX 5060 Ti, nevertheless, does have slightly additional within the tank, so in case you are completely happy to overclock, we have discovered you possibly can constantly create a efficiency delta of round 10% between the 2 playing cards within the Nvidia GPU’s favour.
It is value noting right here that it is the 16 GB model of this card that we’re recommending right here (although in case you merely can’t go north of $300, the 8 GB model would not be a foul shout). Each AMD and Nvidia have launched twin variations of their playing cards with 16 and eight GB VRAM allocations and, given the memory-intensive route detail-heavy fashionable video games are going, that additional reminiscence headroom shall be beneficial even in case you’re gaming at 1440p.
So, our advice could be to purpose for that 16 GB model you probably have the persistence to avoid wasting up slightly longer, as it would assist in the long term. Then you definately’ll be rocking an actual strong, fairly low energy GPU, that may stand toe-to-toe with the dearer Nvidia playing cards.
Learn our full Radeon RX 9060 XT evaluate.
⬇️ Click on to load the benchmark information⬇️

3. Greatest price range graphics card: Intel Arc B570
Purchase if…
✅ You’re on a restrictive price range: Across the Arc B570’s MSRP there may be nothing that may actually compete proper now. If you happen to can spend a bit extra you’ll get much more efficiency out of a $300 RTX 5060 8 GB, however that is solely an choice in case you the spare money.
✅ You are not afraid of discovering a repair: As a comparatively new participant in discrete GPUs, Intel’s drivers will flip up points often in newly launched video games, however in case you can watch for a driver repair, or are keen to discover a workaround they are often ironed out.
Do not buy if…
❌ Yow will discover an RTX 5050 at an analogous worth: The most affordable RTX Blackwell GPU is at present struggling inventory points, however has a launch worth that’s near the Arc B570 and may beat it by round 10% on common in video games.
❌ You do not ever need to cope with driver points: You’ll possible have some problem with the B570 sooner or later, in some new sport, and if that is going to be a deal-breaker for you then possibly steer clear. Although it’s value noting that Nvidia’s drivers have proven a proclivity for flakiness in current instances… Intet isn’t alone in that.
The underside line
🪛 The Intel Arc B570 is a ‘proper now’ advice for the most effective price range graphics card. If Nvidia’s RTX 5050 hits its ~$250 worth level then that turns into a much more compelling choice than Intel’s price range card until that may drop beneath the $200 mark. However proper now it’s the best choice for these on a restricted price range on the lookout for good 1080p gaming efficiency and an honest degree of VRAM.
Troublesome GPU suggestions is kinda the theme for this graphics card tier record, and so they do not come a lot more durable than the price range choose. In a world the place GPU pricing has been trending ever larger for the reason that pandemic, and even previous to that with the ethereum mining booms, it is arduous going looking for a very low-cost graphics card that is nonetheless definitely worth the cash in 2025.
Now, bear with me, since you is likely to be fairly stunned at my advice of the Intel Arc B570 as the most effective of something within the GPU market. However Intel’s drivers have improved measurably for the reason that first Arc Alchemist playing cards arrived, and whereas you can see some new video games that do not play good at launch, and there stay some compatibility points with AMD’s X3D chips, when it really works correctly it is the most effective sub-$300 card round.
At the very least till we’re certain how the new RTX 5050 performs, however Nvidia has been holding again opinions of its 8 GB playing cards on this era. For causes. However, based on Nvidia’s personal numbers it is primarily an RTX 4060 degree card with MFG, and if yow will discover that for $250 MSRP that is not a foul shout for greatest price range GPU as that may put it round 16% faster than the Arc card on common; generally a lot faster. It is simply launched, although, so the nominally $250 card is out of inventory in all places proper now in any case.
Which leaves the B570 as the one sport on the town. Within the US it too is a ~$250 card—a bit larger than its $220 MSRP—however within the UK it is out there for beneath £200. That does put it in correct price range GPU territory and in case you take inflation into consideration it is across the similar form of degree because the traditional GTX 1050 Ti.
For essentially the most half, that is going to get you round 60 fps on the very highest 1080p graphics settings, and that is native efficiency earlier than you begin to usher in both upscaling or body era. Whenever you try this then the Arc B570 is definitely able to delivering that 60+ fps efficiency at 1440p, too, and clearly even larger at 1080p.
A part of that’s as a result of this is not simply one other 8 GB graphics card, Intel has caught 10 GB of GDDR6 on this price range card, and given it extra reminiscence bandwidth than the RX 9060 XT, too.
If pricing actually is a matter, and also you need a card that may ship first rate body charges with out breaking the financial institution, then Intel’s Arc B570 is value a glance. The caveat, nevertheless, is that whereas drivers are higher you can see some kinks nonetheless to be labored out in Intel’s drivers (my B570 particularly will not work in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, however is okay at different resolutions and with different video games) which implies you need to be keen to simply accept that.
If you happen to simply need a price range card that may simply work, then the RTX 5050 would possibly nicely be a greater card for you. Although, I’ll say that Nvidia’s personal drivers, which have beforehand been rock-solid, have been frustratingly unreliable with the RTX Blackwell era of GPUs. On the subject of price range graphics playing cards, there may be all the time going to be some compromise, I am afraid.
⬇️ Click on to load the benchmark information⬇️

4. Greatest mid-range graphics card: Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti
Purchase if…
✅ Yow will discover it for near MSRP: I get it, costs have been buck-wild lately, however they’re coming down throughout most of the globe, and at its extra cheap worth the RTX 5070 Ti is a incredible graphics card.
✅ You’re completely happy to overclock: Such is the extent of GPU headroom within the GB203 that overclocking the RTX 5070 Ti is mostly a no-brainer. Much more so as a result of it does not unduly stress the graphics silicon, is straightforward to do, and may genuinely get you a bunch extra frames per second for little effort.
✅ You are not ideologically against Multi Body Era: The RTX 5070 Ti’s native efficiency is available in at a degree the place MFG actually comes into its personal, delivering tremendous excessive, tremendous easy body charges the place it is supported. Which is a whole lot of video games, proper now. However in case you’re in opposition to it on principal irrespective of how good it seems then the RX 9070 XT might be the GPU for you.
Do not buy if…
❌ The worth delta between it and the RX 9070 XT is over $100: The RTX 5070 Ti and RX 9070 XT playing cards go head-to-head within the efficiency stakes, and Nvidia’s playing cards nearly has the sting on the subject of function set and overclocking, however that is provided that costs are comparatively shut. When there is a massive hole between them then the cheaper AMD card makes for the most effective mid-range graphics card.
The underside line
🪛 The Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti is the most effective mid-range graphics card you should buy if you should buy it for an affordable worth. It is an impressive 1440p card, and with all of the gaming assists on, corresponding to upscaling and MFG, it is a powerful 4K GPU, too. However costs have been far too near $900 in current instances, and that makes it a tougher advice. Nearer to its $750 MSRP, nevertheless, and it is an awesome graphics card.
If you happen to have been questioning the place all of the Nvidia playing cards have been on this record you are about to hit the motherlode, as a result of on the higher-end of the market the GeForce GPUs are those you actually must covet. The RTX Blackwell structure might not be an enormous silicon enchancment over its forebear, however there may be sufficient within the mixture of DLSS 4, Multi Body Era (MFG), and the slight GPU redesign to offer you a critical enhance in efficiency.
MFG does its greatest work when there’s a decently excessive body price moving into, which implies you possibly can easy out efficiency, delivering very excessive body charges with out massively spiking the PC latency. That is the most effective case situation for MFG, and with the RTX 5070 Ti as the most effective mid-range graphics card you are getting the Nvidia function set working to its fullest potential.
There’s nonetheless a case to be made for the cheaper AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, as a result of with subsequent driver updates its efficiency has improved to the purpose the place at native resolutions it would generally outpace the Nvidia competitors. Now costs are beginning to cool down on the AMD facet it is getting much more reasonably priced, whereas within the US particularly, the RTX 5070 Ti nonetheless instructions a excessive price ticket.
Issues are extra even within the UK and the remainder of the world, which does make it tougher to choose the AMD over the Nvidia GPU when it comes to efficiency and gaming expertise. The place costs are nearer collectively I will facet with the GeForce card because of its simpler function set, the truth that MFG does genuinely work at this degree, and that it’s a very succesful overclocker.
To be honest, each AMD and Nvidia playing cards are at this degree, however the RTX Blackwell has a lot simply accessible GPU headroom that overclocking isn’t solely easy, however bears little to no precise danger in working your card at a better degree completely. It is probably not any hotter, or extra demanding of energy, so why would not you? I’ve personally examined 4 completely different RTX 5070 Ti playing cards and each single one among them could possibly be pushed to across the similar degree of three+ GHz clock speeds with out even touching 70 °C.
With all of the assists on, the RTX 5070 Ti will constantly ship triple-figure body charges in all the newest video games at 1440p, and given its common 60+ fps natively at that decision, you will additionally discover it a greater than succesful 4K graphics card with upscaling and MFG thrown in for good measure.
And when costs normalise throughout the board as time marches inexorably alongside, then we’ll get again in direction of the MSRP of the RTX 5070 Ti and that ought to cement its place as the most effective mid-range graphics card in each territory.
Learn our full Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti evaluate.
⬇️ Click on to load the benchmark information⬇️

5. Greatest high-end graphics card: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090
Purchase if…
✅ You need the most effective: If you wish to nail triple determine body charges within the newest 4K video games, then you are going to want the would possibly and magic of Multi Body Gen, and that is solely out there with the RTX 50-series playing cards. And sure, I do like alliteration.
✅ You to get in on the bottom flooring of neural rendering: The RTX Blackwell GPUs are the primary chips to come back with a full set of shaders that may have direct entry to the Tensor Cores of the cardboard. That may allow a brand new world of AI-powered gaming options… when devs get round to utilizing them in launched video games.
✅ You are after a hyper-powerful SFF rig: The Founders Version is deliciously slimline, and whereas it generates a whole lot of warmth it would slot in a few of the smallest small type issue PC chassis round.
Do not buy if…
❌ You’ll want to ask the worth: With a $400 worth hike over the RTX 4090, the brand new RTX 5090 is an entire lot of money at its $1,999 MSRP. The kicker, nevertheless, is that you’re going to be fortunate to seek out one at that worth given the third-party playing cards are trying like $2,500+ proper now.
The underside line
🪛 The RTX 5090 is essentially the most {powerful} client graphics card on the planet proper now, and delivers gaming efficiency far past what you would handle on different GPUs, particularly in case you’re enjoying one thing which helps Multi Body Era.
The RTX Blackwell era of latest GPUs has kicked off with a bang, and implies that proper now, the most effective graphics card is undoubtedly the Nvidia RTX 5090. And is more likely to stay that means for the subsequent two years a minimum of. Given the truth that AMD is not going to launch a competitor card for the highest GeForce GPU within the RDNA 4 era, you will be assured in case you choose one among these up immediately (or after they come again in inventory) you’ll nonetheless be gaming on the most effective GPU in all probability till the subsequent Nvidia era is launched.
Whereas that may make for depressing studying for AMD followers, it needs to be slightly extra comforting for anybody hellbent on spending $2,000+ on a brand new graphics card. It is going to, a minimum of, final the course on the high of benchmarking tree.
Positive, you’re solely getting some 30% additional gen-on-gen efficiency over the RTX 4090 at 4K, and that’s the smallest efficiency bump over a earlier era’s high card since Turing got here alongside. However there is a magic trick up the sleeve of the RTX Blackwell playing cards, and that’s Multi Body Era.
Proper now, it is restricted to the RTX 50-series—else it will possible cannibalise gross sales to an enormous extent down the stack if RTX 40-series GPUs have been allowed into the MFG social gathering—and it provides in as much as three extra frames in between every truly rendered pair. Utilizing a function known as Flip Metering, which utilises an enhanced little bit of silicon within the RTX 50-series Show Engine, it offloads all of the burden of body pacing from the CPU, places all of it on the GPU, and permits the RTX 5090 to queue up all these additional AI-generated frames completely for the show.
Together with a brand new AI-based body era mannequin, Multi Body Era is ready to massively improve the potential efficiency of the RTX 5090 in any sport which helps it, and the outcomes are frankly unbelievable. There are some small artifacts—although nothing that may cease me utilizing the function—however the actually spectacular factor is that it provides virtually no additional latency on high of the usual 2x Body Era expertise.
And that itself has been lowered because of that new FG AI mannequin which makes it 40% faster and 30% much less VRAM hungry on the similar time. The excellent news for RTX 40-series patrons is that mannequin a minimum of is coming to straightforward Body Gen within the Ada era, too.
There are additionally a ton of video games at launch with quick compatibility with MFG, both with it natively carried out within the sport, à la Cyberpunk 2077, or by way of the brand new DLSS Override function within the Nvidia App, as in Dragon Age: The Veilguard.
It is also essentially the most {powerful} client GPU on the subject of creator duties, too, because of its hefty 32 GB of GDDR7 and its huge bandwidth, but additionally as a result of it is so damned good with an AI noodling if GenAI is your factor.
Briefly, the RTX 5090 is the most effective graphics card for anybody who desires absolutely the most interesting silicon and have set of any client GPU going. You are simply going to should pay by means of the nostril for it till inventory settles down. If it ever does to an extent that MSRP variations of the cardboard turn out to be available.
Learn our full Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 evaluate.
⬇️ Click on to load the benchmark information⬇️

How we check graphics playing cards

I’ve been benchmarking graphics playing cards for the reason that 2000s, and have used many various video games, functions, and methodologies over the intervening years. And, for essentially the most half, testing GPUs is a largely goal course of; you check the silicon in several methods, come out with a set of benchmark figures which you then evaluate in opposition to one other set of numbers from a special card, or playing cards, to have the ability to objectively inform which is empirically the most effective.
Our present GPU check suite consists of Black Fable Wukong, Cyberpunk 2077, F1 24, Homeworld 3, Metro Exodus Enhanced Version, The Talos Precept 2, andTotal Battle: Warhammer III for our gaming exams. These exams are carried out utilizing the identical sport and system settings throughout all of the graphics playing cards we check, and are run at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions.
We measure utilizing each the common body price and the 1% Low FPS determine. This provides us a basic measure of in-game efficiency in addition to permitting us to see simply how constant that body price degree is. The 1% Low FPS measure reveals the common of the best 1% of body instances in any given benchmarking run. Translating that into frames per second (1000/x ms) provides us the information to indicate whether or not there are commonly giant drops in efficiency or whether or not it is comparatively steady.
We seize this information utilizing the Nvidia Frameview app working excessive of no matter sport we’re benchmarking, whether or not the sport will give its personal information output or not.
We additionally use the UL suite of benchmark software program to get some artificial testing accomplished in opposition to high-end rastererisation efficiency with 3DMark Time Spy Excessive, and ray tracing efficiency with 3DMark Port Royal.

With the brand new RTX Blackwell playing cards, we have additionally been utilizing a choice of video games to assist us get a bead on the influence of Multi Body Era on each body price and PC latency, too. In addition to retesting completely different ranges of MFG (at both 1440p for decrease finish playing cards or 4K for high-end GPUs) with Cyberpunk 2077, we additionally use the ultra-demanding Alan Wake 2 and Dragon Age: Veilguard for its implementation by way of the Nvidia App.
Precise gaming efficiency is not the entire story with graphics playing cards, nevertheless, as they’re used for various makes use of exterior of gaming. Whereas we’re PC Gamer, we all know that some individuals need to have the ability to use their PC for 3D rendering, enhancing, or generative AI makes use of, and so we run the Blender benchmark, PugetBench for DaVinci Resolve, and Procyon’s picture era benchmark utilizing StableDiffusion.
We additionally seize a ton of system information, too, utilizing the Nvidia PCAT device (a riser board which sits between the GPU and PCIe slot) to measure precise graphics card energy draw. This implies we are able to observe each peak and common energy use when gaming, and a given GPU’s efficiency per Watt metrics, too.
For this we use three back-to-back runs of the Metro Exodus Enhanced Version benchmark, at 1080p and 4K, to offer us the ability numbers, in addition to peak and common temperatures and common GPU clock velocity, too.
On high of this we can even check the overclocking capabilities of graphics playing cards, by pushing them so far as we are able to utilizing normal overclocking methodologies; ie. the identical as you’ll be capable to simply do at house. No LN2 sniffing occurring right here.
However there are additionally subjective measures which come into play when truly choosing the most effective graphics card. And that every one comes all the way down to a constant driver expertise when utilizing the GPU, how loud the cooling followers can get, whether or not there may be discomforting coil whine or different electrical noise, and simply how a lot damned cash producers are charging for these playing cards.
Briefly, there’s lots that goes into our testing.
Within the PC Gamer workplace—and generally my very own satellite tv for pc workplace up the hill if I am testing into the wee hours of the morning—we have now a devoted check rig that we use for testing graphics playing cards. That is our AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D-based system:
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | Motherboard: Gigabyte X870E Aorus Grasp | RAM: G.Talent 32 GB DDR5-6000 CAS 30 | Cooler: Corsair H170i Elite Capellix | SSD: 2 TB Essential T700 | PSU: Seasonic Prime TX 1600W | Case: DimasTech Mini V2
We even have two different programs, kindly offered by MSI and CyberpowerPC, which we use if one other member of the staff, corresponding to Jacob, Nick, or Andy, must benchmark a card. These journey across the UK, and each home the identical set of elements so we are able to keep a number of testing PCs which ship information we are able to use to correct reference different playing cards.
The place are the most effective graphics card offers?

5 issues I all the time inform individuals earlier than they purchase their first graphics card
GPU hierarchy
Under we have now listed a number of generations of graphics card primarily based on a easy 3DMark Time Spy Excessive GPU index rating. That is solely a tough approximation of relative gaming efficiency between the differnt graphics playing cards, as there may be extra variance than simply with a single artificial benchmark, however it’s nonetheless snap shot of the place the playing cards stack up in opposition to one another.
Nvidia GPU specs
|
Mannequin |
MSRP (US$) |
Launch |
GPU |
Lithography |
CUDA cores |
Reminiscence dimension (GB) |
Die dimension (mm²) |
Transistors (B) |
SM depend |
TMUs |
ROPs |
Tensor cores |
RT cores |
L2 cache (MB) |
Enhance clock (MHz) |
Reminiscence kind |
Reminiscence bus width (bits) |
Reminiscence bandwidth (GB/s) |
TDP (W) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 5050 |
$249 |
Jul 16, 2025 |
GB207-300 |
TSMC 4N |
2560 |
8 |
121 |
15.1 |
20 |
80 |
32 |
80 |
20 |
32 |
2572 |
GDDR6 |
128 |
320 |
130 |
|
RTX 5060 |
$299 |
Might, 19, 2025 |
GB206-250 |
TSMC 4N |
3840 |
8 |
181 |
21.9 |
30 |
120 |
48 |
120 |
30 |
32 |
2497 |
GDDR7 |
128 |
448 |
145 |
|
RTX 5060 Ti |
$379 / $429 |
Apr, 16, 2025 |
GB205-300 |
TSMC 4N |
4608 |
8 / 16 |
181 |
21.9 |
36 |
144 |
48 |
144 |
36 |
32 |
2572 |
GDDR7 |
128 |
448 |
180 |
|
RTX 5070 |
$549 |
Mar 5, 2025 |
GB205-300 |
TSMC 4N |
6144 |
12 |
263 |
31.1 |
48 |
192 |
80 |
192 |
48 |
48 |
2512 |
GDDR7 |
192 |
672 |
250 |
|
RTX 5070 Ti |
$749 |
Feb 20, 2025 |
GB203-300 |
TSMC 4N |
8960 |
16 |
378 |
45.6 |
70 |
280 |
96 |
280 |
70 |
64 |
2452 |
GDDR7 |
256 |
896 |
300 |
|
RTX 5080 |
$999 |
Feb 20, 2025 |
GB203-400 |
TSMC 4N |
10752 |
16 |
378 |
45.6 |
84 |
336 |
112 |
336 |
84 |
64 |
2617 |
GDDR7 |
256 |
960 |
360 |
|
RTX 5090 |
$1999 |
Jan 30, 2025 |
GB202-300 |
TSMC 4N |
21760 |
32 |
750 |
92.2 |
170 |
680 |
176 |
680 |
170 |
96 |
2407 |
GDDR7 |
512 |
1792 |
575 |
|
Mannequin |
MSRP (US$) |
Launch |
GPU |
Lithography |
CUDA cores |
Reminiscence dimension (GB) |
Die dimension (mm²) |
Transistors (B) |
SM depend |
TMUs |
ROPs |
Tensor cores |
RT cores |
L2 cache (MB) |
Enhance clock (MHz) |
Reminiscence kind |
Reminiscence bus width (bits) |
Reminiscence bandwidth (GB/s) |
TDP (W) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 4060 |
$299 |
Jun 29, 2023 |
AD107-400 |
TSMC 4N |
3072 |
8 |
159 |
18.9 |
24 |
96 |
32 |
96 |
24 |
24 |
2460 |
GDDR6 |
128 |
272 |
115 |
|
RTX 4060 Ti |
$399 |
Might 24, 2023 |
AD106-350 |
TSMC 4N |
4352 |
8 |
188 |
22.9 |
34 |
136 |
48 |
136 |
34 |
32 |
2535 |
GDDR6 |
128 |
288 |
160 |
|
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
$499 |
Jul 18, 2023 |
AD106-351 |
TSMC 4N |
4352 |
16 |
188 |
22.9 |
34 |
136 |
48 |
136 |
34 |
32 |
2535 |
GDDR6 |
128 |
288 |
165 |
|
RTX 4070 |
$599 |
Apr 13, 2023 |
AD104-250 |
TSMC 4N |
5888 |
12 |
294.5 |
35.8 |
46 |
184 |
64 |
184 |
46 |
36 |
2475 |
GDDR6X |
192 |
504 |
200 |
|
RTX 4070 Tremendous |
$599 |
Jan 17, 2024 |
AD104-350 |
TSMC 4N |
7168 |
12 |
294.5 |
35.8 |
56 |
224 |
80 |
224 |
56 |
48 |
2475 |
GDDR6X |
192 |
504 |
220 |
|
RTX 4070 Ti |
$799 |
Jan 5, 2023 |
AD104-400 |
TSMC 4N |
7680 |
12 |
294.5 |
35.8 |
60 |
240 |
80 |
240 |
60 |
48 |
2610 |
GDDR6X |
192 |
504 |
285 |
|
RTX 4070 Ti Tremendous |
$799 |
Jan 24, 2024 |
AD103-275 |
TSMC 4N |
8448 |
16 |
379 |
45.9 |
66 |
264 |
96 |
264 |
66 |
48 |
2610 |
GDDR6X |
256 |
672 |
285 |
|
RTX 4080 |
$1199 |
Nov 16, 2022 |
AD103-300 |
TSMC 4N |
9728 |
16 |
379 |
45.9 |
76 |
304 |
112 |
304 |
76 |
64 |
2505 |
GDDR6X |
256 |
716.8 |
320 |
|
RTX 4080 Tremendous |
$999 |
Jan 31, 2024 |
AD103-400 |
TSMC 4N |
10240 |
16 |
379 |
45.9 |
80 |
320 |
112 |
320 |
80 |
64 |
2550 |
GDDR6X |
256 |
736 |
320 |
|
RTX 4090 |
$1599 |
Oct 12, 2022 |
AD102-300 |
TSMC 4N |
16384 |
24 |
608.5 |
76.3 |
128 |
512 |
176 |
512 |
128 |
72 |
2520 |
GDDR6X |
384 |
1008 |
450 |
|
Mannequin |
MSRP (US$) |
Launch |
GPU |
Lithography |
CUDA cores |
Reminiscence dimension (GB) |
Die dimension (mm²) |
Transistors (B) |
SM depend |
TMUs |
ROPs |
Tensor cores |
RT cores |
L2 cache (MB) |
Enhance clock (MHz) |
Reminiscence kind |
Reminiscence bus width (bits) |
Reminiscence bandwidth (GB/s) |
TDP (W) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 3050 |
$169 / $249 |
Jan 27, 2022 |
GA106-150 |
Samsung 8nm |
2560 |
6 / 8 |
276 |
12 |
20 |
80 |
32 |
80 |
20 |
2 |
1777 |
GDDR6 |
128 |
168 / 224 |
130 |
|
RTX 3060 |
$329 |
Feb 25, 2021 |
GA106-300 |
Samsung 8nm |
3584 |
8 / 12 |
276 |
12 |
28 |
112 |
48 |
112 |
28 |
3 |
1777 |
GDDR6 |
192 |
240 / 360 |
170 |
|
RTX 3060 Ti |
$399 |
Dec 1, 2020 |
GA104-200 |
Samsung 8nm |
4864 |
8 |
392 |
17.4 |
38 |
152 |
80 |
152 |
38 |
4 |
1665 |
GDDR6/X |
256 |
448 / 608 |
200 |
|
RTX 3070 |
$499 |
Oct 29, 2020 |
GA104-300 |
Samsung 8nm |
5888 |
8 |
392 |
17.4 |
46 |
184 |
96 |
184 |
46 |
4 |
1725 |
GDDR6 |
256 |
448 |
220 |
|
RTX 3070 Ti |
$599 |
Jun 10, 2021 |
GA104-400 |
Samsung 8nm |
6144 |
8 |
392 |
17.4 |
48 |
192 |
96 |
192 |
48 |
4 |
1770 |
GDDR6X |
256 |
608.3 |
290 |
|
RTX 3080 |
$699 |
Sep 17, 2020 |
GA102-200 |
Samsung 8nm |
8704 |
10 |
628 |
28.3 |
68 |
272 |
96 |
272 |
68 |
5 |
1710 |
GDDR6X |
320 |
760.3 |
320 |
|
RTX 3080 12 GB |
$799 |
Jan 11, 2022 |
GA102-220 |
Samsung 8nm |
8960 |
12 |
628 |
28.3 |
70 |
280 |
96 |
280 |
70 |
5 |
1710 |
GDDR6X |
384 |
912.4 |
350 |
|
RTX 3080 Ti |
$1199 |
Jun 3, 2021 |
GA102-225 |
Samsung 8nm |
10240 |
12 |
628 |
28.3 |
80 |
320 |
112 |
320 |
80 |
6 |
1665 |
GDDR6X |
384 |
912.4 |
350 |
|
RTX 3090 |
$1499 |
Sep 24, 2020 |
GA102-300 |
Samsung 8nm |
10496 |
24 |
628 |
28.3 |
82 |
328 |
112 |
328 |
82 |
6 |
1695 |
GDDR6X |
384 |
936.2 |
350 |
|
RTX 3090 Ti |
$1999 |
Mar 29, 2022 |
GA102-350 |
Samsung 8nm |
10752 |
24 |
628 |
28.3 |
84 |
336 |
112 |
336 |
84 |
6 |
1860 |
GDDR6X |
384 |
1008 |
450 |
| Row 10 – Cell 0 | Row 10 – Cell 1 | Row 10 – Cell 2 | Row 10 – Cell 3 | Row 10 – Cell 4 | Row 10 – Cell 5 | Row 10 – Cell 6 | Row 10 – Cell 7 | Row 10 – Cell 8 | Row 10 – Cell 9 | Row 10 – Cell 10 | Row 10 – Cell 11 | Row 10 – Cell 12 | Row 10 – Cell 13 | Row 10 – Cell 14 | Row 10 – Cell 15 | Row 10 – Cell 16 | Row 10 – Cell 17 | Row 10 – Cell 18 | Row 10 – Cell 19 |
|
Mannequin |
MSRP (US$) |
Launch |
GPU |
Lithography |
CUDA cores |
Reminiscence dimension (GB) |
Die dimension (mm²) |
Transistors (B) |
SM depend |
TMUs |
ROPs |
Tensor cores |
RT cores |
L2 cache (MB) |
Enhance clock (MHz) |
Reminiscence kind |
Reminiscence bus width (bits) |
Reminiscence bandwidth (GB/s) |
TDP (W) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RTX 2060 |
$299 / $349 |
Jan 15, 2019 |
TU106-200 / TU106-300 / TU104-150 |
TSMC 12 nm |
1920 / 2176 |
6 / 12 |
445 / 545 |
10.8 / 13.6 |
30 / 34 |
120 / 136 |
48 / 64 |
240 / 272 |
30 / 34 |
3 |
1650 / 1680 |
GDDR6 |
192 |
336 |
160 / 185 |
|
RTX 2060 Tremendous |
$399 |
Jul 9, 2019 |
TU106-410 |
TSMC 12 nm |
2176 |
8 |
445 |
10.8 |
34 |
136 |
64 |
272 |
34 |
4 |
1650 |
GDDR6 |
256 |
448 |
175 |
|
RTX 2070 |
$499 |
Oct 17, 2019 |
TU106-400 |
TSMC 12 nm |
2304 |
8 |
445 |
10.8 |
36 |
144 |
64 |
288 |
36 |
4 |
1620 |
GDDR6 |
256 |
448 |
175 |
|
RTX 2070 Tremendous |
$499 |
Jul 9, 2019 |
TU104-410 |
TSMC 12 nm |
2560 |
8 |
545 |
13.6 |
40 |
160 |
64 |
320 |
40 |
4 |
1770 |
GDDR6 |
256 |
448 |
215 |
|
RTX 2080 |
$699 |
Sep 20, 2018 |
TU104-400 |
TSMC 12 nm |
2944 |
8 |
545 |
13.6 |
46 |
184 |
64 |
368 |
46 |
4 |
1710 |
GDDR6 |
256 |
448 |
215 |
|
RTX 2080 Tremendous |
$699 |
Jul 23, 20190 |
TU104-450 |
TSMC 12 nm |
3072 |
8 |
545 |
13.6 |
48 |
192 |
64 |
384 |
48 |
4 |
1815 |
GDDR6 |
256 |
499.2 |
250 |
|
RTX 2080 Ti |
$999 |
Sep 20, 2018 |
TU102-300 |
TSMC 12 nm |
4352 |
11 |
754 |
18.6 |
68 |
272 |
88 |
544 |
68 |
5.5 |
1545 |
GDDR6 |
352 |
616 |
250 |
|
Titan RTX |
$2499 |
Dec 18, 2018 |
TU102-400 |
TSMC 12 nm |
4608 |
24 |
754 |
18.6 |
72 |
288 |
96 |
576 |
72 |
6 |
1770 |
GDDR6 |
384 |
672 |
280 |
AMD GPU specs
|
Mannequin |
MSRP (US$) |
Launch |
GPU |
Compute Items (CUs) |
Reminiscence Measurement (GB) |
Fab |
Transistors (B) |
Die Measurement (mm²) |
Shaders |
TMUs |
ROPs |
Ray Accelerators |
AI Accelerators |
Reminiscence Sort |
Reminiscence bus |
TBP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RX 9060 XT |
$269 |
Might 25, 2023 |
Navi 44 |
32 |
8 / 16 |
TSMC N4P |
29.7 |
199 |
2048 |
128 |
64 |
32 |
64 |
GDDR6 |
128 |
150 / 160 |
|
RX 9070 GRE |
$449 |
Sep 6, 2023 |
Navi 48 |
48 |
12 |
TSMC N4P |
53.9 |
356.5 |
3072 |
192 |
96 |
48 |
96 |
GDDR6 |
192 |
220 |
|
RX 9070 |
$499 |
Sep 6, 2023 |
Navi 48 |
56 |
16 |
TSMC N4P |
53.9 |
356.5 |
3584 |
224 |
128 |
56 |
112 |
GDDR6 |
256 |
220 |
|
RX 9070 XT |
$899 |
Dec 13, 2022 |
Navi 48 |
64 |
16 |
TSMC N4P |
53.9 |
356.5 |
4096 |
256 |
128 |
64 |
128 |
GDDR6 |
256 |
304 |
|
Mannequin |
MSRP (US$) |
Launch |
Code Identify |
Compute Items (CUs) |
Fab |
Transistors (B) |
Die Measurement (mm²) |
Shaders |
TMUs |
ROPs |
Ray Accelerators |
AI Accelerators |
Reminiscence Measurement (GB) |
Reminiscence Sort |
Reminiscence Bus |
TBP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RX 7600 |
$269 |
Might 25, 2023 |
Navi 33 |
32 |
6nm |
13.3 |
204 |
2048 |
128 |
64 |
32 |
64 |
8 |
GDDR6 |
128 |
165 |
|
RX 7700 XT |
$449 |
Sep 6, 2023 |
Navi 32 |
54 |
5nm |
28.1 |
346 |
3456 |
216 |
96 |
54 |
108 |
12 |
GDDR6 |
192 |
245 |
|
RX 7800 XT |
$499 |
Sep 6, 2023 |
Navi 32 |
60 |
5nm |
28.1 |
346 |
3840 |
240 |
96 |
60 |
120 |
16 |
GDDR6 |
256 |
263 |
|
RX 7900 XT |
$899 |
Dec 13, 2022 |
Navi 31 |
84 |
5nm |
57.7 |
529 |
5376 |
336 |
192 |
84 |
168 |
20 |
GDDR6 |
320 |
315 |
|
RX 7900 XTX |
$999 |
Dec 13, 2022 |
Navi 31 |
96 |
5nm |
57.7 |
529 |
6144 |
384 |
192 |
96 |
192 |
24 |
GDDR6 |
384 |
355 |
|
Mannequin |
Launch |
Code Identify |
Fab |
Transistors (B) |
Die Measurement (mm²) |
Compute Items (CUs) |
Shaders |
TMUs |
ROPs |
Reminiscence Measurement (GB) |
Reminiscence Sort |
MSRP (US$) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RX 6600 |
Oct 13, 2021 |
Navi 23 |
7nm |
11.06 |
237 |
28 |
1792 |
112 |
64 |
8 |
GDDR6 |
$329 |
|
RX 6600 XT |
Aug 11, 2021 |
Navi 23 |
7nm |
11.06 |
237 |
32 |
2048 |
128 |
64 |
8 |
GDDR6 |
$379 |
|
RX 6700 XT |
Mar 18, 2021 |
Navi 22 |
7nm |
17.2 |
335 |
40 |
2560 |
160 |
64 |
12 |
GDDR6 |
$479 |
|
RX 6800 |
Nov 18, 2020 |
Navi 21 |
7nm |
26.8 |
520 |
60 |
3840 |
240 |
96 |
16 |
GDDR6 |
$579 |
|
RX 6800 XT |
Nov 18, 2020 |
Navi 21 |
7nm |
26.8 |
520 |
72 |
4608 |
288 |
128 |
16 |
GDDR6 |
$649 |
|
RX 6900 XT |
Dec 8, 2020 |
Navi 21 |
7nm |
26.8 |
520 |
80 |
5120 |
320 |
128 |
16 |
GDDR6 |
$999 |
|
RX 6950 XT |
Might 10, 2022 |
Navi 21 |
7nm |
26.8 |
520 |
80 |
5120 |
320 |
128 |
16 |
GDDR6 |
$1099 |
|
Mannequin |
Launch |
Code Identify |
Fab |
Transistors (B) |
Die Measurement (mm²) |
Compute Items (CUs) |
Shaders |
TMUs |
ROPs |
Reminiscence Measurement (GB) |
Reminiscence Sort |
MSRP (US$) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RX 5500 XT |
Dec 12, 2019 |
Navi 14 |
7nm |
6.4 |
158 |
22 |
1408 |
88 |
32 |
4/8 |
GDDR6 |
$169 |
|
RX 5600 XT |
Jan 21, 2020 |
Navi 10 |
7nm |
10.3 |
251 |
36 |
2304 |
144 |
64 |
6 |
GDDR6 |
$279 |
|
RX 5700 |
Jul 7, 2019 |
Navi 10 |
7nm |
10.3 |
251 |
36 |
2304 |
144 |
64 |
8 |
GDDR6 |
$349 |
|
RX 5700 XT |
Jul 7, 2019 |
Navi 10 |
7nm |
10.3 |
251 |
40 |
2560 |
160 |
64 |
8 |
GDDR6 |
$399 |
PC Gamer graphics card opinions
⬇️ Click on to load extra GPU opinions⬇️











































